Harri Hemilä1, Teija Koivula1
1Department of Public Health, POB 41, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Citation example: Hemilä H, Koivula T. Vitamin C for preventing and treating tetanus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006665. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006665.pub2.
Department of Public Health, POB 41
University of Helsinki
|Assessed as Up-to-date:||26 August 2011|
|Date of Search:||04 August 2011|
|Next Stage Expected:||30 August 2013|
|Protocol First Published:||Issue 3, 2007|
|Review First Published:||Issue 2, 2008|
|Last Citation Issue:||Issue 2, 2008|
|Date / Event||Description|
|26 August 2011|
New search, no new trials identified, conclusions not changed
|Date / Event||Description|
|19 November 2009|
New search, no new trials identified, conclusions not changed
|11 November 2008|
Contact details updated
|06 August 2008|
Converted to new review format
|15 January 2008|
New citation: conclusions changed
Tetanus is a severe disease that can be prevented by vaccination. In developing countries vaccination coverage is not always high, and cases still occur in developed countries, particularly in elderly people owing to their reduced immuno protection. There are hundreds of thousands of tetanus cases per year globally. In animal studies, vitamin C has protected against various infections. In a study with rats, vitamin C protected against the purified tetanus toxin.
We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 4 August 2011); Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register (Searched 24 August 2011); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to August Week 2 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations August 18, 2011); and Ovid EMBASE (2009 to 2010 Week 50) and the reference lists of relevant reviews and monographs.
Controlled trials of vitamin C as a prevention or treatment for tetanus, whether or not these were placebo controlled, in any language, published or unpublished. Two authors independently made inclusion decisions.
Both review authors independently extracted data from trial reports and assessed methodological quality. We calculated the relative risk of death by using the RevMan computer program and odds ratio by using the StatXact computer program.
One single trial was eligible for inclusion. This non-randomised, controlled, unblinded trial undertaken in Bangladesh involved 117 tetanus patients. Vitamin C at a dosage of 1 g/day was administered intravenously alongside conventional treatment. At recruitment, the participants were stratified into two age groups and the results were reported by age. In the children aged 1 to 12 years (n = 62), vitamin C treatment was associated with a 100% reduction in tetanus mortality (95% CI from -100% to -94%). In people aged 13 to 30 years (n = 55), vitamin C treatment was associated with a 45% reduction in tetanus mortality (95% CI from -69% to -5%).
A single, non-randomised, poorly reported trial of vitamin C as a treatment for tetanus suggests a considerable reduction in mortality. However, concerns about trial quality mean that this result must be interpreted with caution and that vitamin C cannot be recommended as a treatment for tetanus on the basis of this evidence. New trials should be carried out to examine the effect of vitamin C on tetanus treatment.
Tetanus is a disease caused by tetanus toxin, which is produced by the bacterium Clostridium tetani. This bacterium typically infects penetrating wounds contaminated by foreign material such as soil. In developing countries, poor hygiene after childbirth may cause tetanus in newborn babies. Even though vaccination has dramatically decreased the burden of tetanus, there are still hundreds of thousands of cases per year globally. We found one controlled trial that examined whether one gram per day of intravenous vitamin C would help in the treatment of tetanus patients. Vitamin C was used alongside standard treatments for tetanus. Intravenous vitamin C reduced the mortality of children aged between 1 and 12 with tetanus by 100% and that of 13 to 30 year old patients by 45%. The trial was not properly conducted and caution is required in the interpretation of the findings. Vitamin C cannot be recommended as a treatment for tetanus on the basis of this single study. Further investigation of the role of vitamin C in tetanus treatment is warranted.
'Tetanus' denotes a disease caused by tetanus toxin (tetanospasmin), a protein that is produced by the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium tetani. Although the pathological definition of tetanus is based on the specified bacterium and its toxin, the diagnosis is made clinically. The clinical picture is dominated by muscle spasms and rigidity. Often the first sign is rigidity of the jaw muscles, followed by stiffness of the neck, difficulty in swallowing, and rigidity of the abdominal muscles. Other symptoms include elevated temperature, raised blood pressure, and an episodically rapid heart rate. Tetanus may lead to complications such as fractures of the spine or long bones because of contractions and convulsions, and to pulmonary embolism, bed sores and nosocomial infections due to prolonged hospitalisation. The current treatment of tetanus consists, for example, of surgical debridement of the wound and antibiotic therapy (metronidazole) to remove the source of infection, tetanus immune globulin to neutralize circulating toxin, and benzodiazepine for sedation and muscle relaxation (Bleck 2005; CDC 2009; Cook 2001; Farrar 2000; Rhee 2005; Thwaites 2006a; WHO 2009).
Tetanus is typically caused by anaerobic bacterial growth in a contaminated penetrating wound. Vaccination against tetanus has dramatically reduced the incidence of the disease in developed countries, but infrequent cases occur, particularly in elderly people owing to reduced immuno protection (Gergen 1995). Nevertheless, hundreds of thousands of tetanus cases per year occur globally (Thwaites 2003).
In developing countries, neonatal tetanus causes over 100,000 infant deaths per year, due largely to poor umbilical hygiene after childbirth. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Somalia had the highest rate in 1999, with 16.5 neonatal tetanus deaths per 1000 live births (WHO 2000). Vaccination of mothers would prevent the majority of these cases and the WHO has campaigned to increase the coverage of vaccination in developing countries (Demicheli 2005; Roper 2007; WHO 2000; WHO 2009).
Although the molecular mechanisms of tetanus toxin in the initiation of pathogenesis are well known, the later stages of the pathological cascade are inadequately understood. There is evidence indicating that disturbances in autonomic control, with sympathetic overactivity (e.g. elevated blood pressure, rapid heart rate) could play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of severe tetanus cases (Cook 2001; CDC 2009; Daher 1997; Wasay 2005). Recently, Thwaites 2006b reported data supporting the possible role of catecholamines (stress hormones) in tetanus. The concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine were much higher in tetanus patients than in other critically ill patients and, amongst the tetanus patients, the concentrations were higher in those who had more severe forms of tetanus.
Vitamin C was identified in the 1930s in the search for the substance deficiencies that cause scurvy. After the identification there was much interest in its effects on diseases unrelated to scurvy, but the role of vitamin C on other diseases is still unsettled. Vitamin C supplementation shortened the duration of colds (Hemilä 2007b) and prevented pneumonia in three trials with participants under special circumstances (Hemilä 2007a). Dietary vitamin C intake modified the effect of vitamin E on the mortality of male smokers (Hemilä 2009). Although such findings indicate that the effects of vitamin C are not limited to preventing scurvy, their practical significance is not clear.
In an early case report, Klenner 1954 described that vitamin C seemed to be beneficial for an unvaccinated six-year-old boy who contracted tetanus. However, vitamin C was used in addition to tetanus antitoxin, penicillin, adrenal cortex extract and Tolserol (mephenesin, muscle relaxant). Although the boy was cured and discharged from hospital on the 18th day, the specific role of vitamin C in the curing process cannot be inferred from the report.
Usually vitamin C is administered as tablets, but it can also be administered intravenously. A recent pharmacokinetic study compared oral and intravenous administration and found substantially higher plasma levels when vitamin C was administered by intravenous route compared with oral administration (Padayatty 2004). The highest dose used in the pharmacokinetic study, 100 g of vitamin C intravenously given over a few hours, increased the plasma concentration peak to 15,000 μmol/L, which is over 100 times the plateau level reached by oral administration (Levine 1996; Padayatty 2004).
Vitamin C is safe in high doses. A dose of approximately 10 mg/day prevents scurvy but, according to the US nutritional recommendations, the 'tolerable upper intake level' is 2 g/day for adults (IOM 2000). The basis for this upper limit is the appearance of diarrhoea, which is, however, a trivial adverse effect that disappears quickly with a reduction in intake. Several other reviewers have also concluded that vitamin C is safe in doses ranging to several grams per day (Hathcock 2005; Hemilä 2006; Rivers 1987).
As described above, sympathetic overactivity with elevated levels of catecholamines may pay a role in the pathophysiology of tetanus. Vitamin C is involved in the synthesis of norepinephrine, and the adrenal glands have the highest concentration of this vitamin in the body (Diliberto 1991; Levine 1985; Patak 2004; Rice 2000). Various infections and purified bacterial toxins lead to the depletion of vitamin C from the adrenal glands (Hemilä 2006). A few experimental studies have shown that vitamin C improved the functions of phagocytes and the proliferation of T-lymphocytes, indicating that it has a role in the immune system (Hemilä 2006). In dozens of animal studies, vitamin C increased resistance against diverse infections and a few purified bacterial toxins (Hemilä 2006). In particular, Dey 1966 reported that five rats administered twice the minimal lethal dose of tetanus toxin all died, whereas 25 rats administered vitamin C either before or after the toxin all lived (Hemilä 2006). Vitamin C also reduced mortality in mice caused by toxins of several Clostridium species (Büller Souto 1939; Hemilä 2006).
Chakrabarti 1955 reported that tetanus patients had lower plasma vitamin C levels than healthy people, and tetanus patients who died had lower levels than those who survived. Furthermore, tetanus patients had elevated levels of dehydroascorbate, which is the oxidized form of vitamin C. Such changes in vitamin C metabolism provide a further rationale to test vitamin C for tetanus patients.
Although vitamin C affects the immune system, it may be important only in particular conditions. For example, it is possible that variation in dietary vitamin C intake is not crucial in the ordinary western population because of their relatively high dietary intake levels, yet vitamin C might be a limiting factor in populations with low intakes. In the extreme, the prevalence of scurvy (vitamin C deficiency) was reported to be up to 44% in refugee camps in Somalia (WHO 1999).
Tetanus is a severe disease afflicting hundreds of thousands of people annually and vitamin C is a safe and inexpensive essential nutrient. The possibility that vitamin C may have an action on tetanus is therefore worthy of systematic consideration.
Links to the publications cited in this Background section, for which full text versions are available, can be found at: www.ltdk.helsinki.fi/users/hemila/CT.
To determine the effects of vitamin C supplementation for:
(1) preventing the development of tetanus in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals;
(2) treating patients with a diagnosis of tetanus.
Controlled clinical trials, both randomised and non-randomised. The review includes studies with and without placebo control since, firstly, it is unlikely that being aware of taking or not taking vitamin C would influence such a severe disease as tetanus; and secondly, a recent meta-analysis of trials comparing a placebo group with a no-treatment group found no evidence of a placebo effect on binary outcomes, although placebo did have an effect on pain measured as a continuous outcome (Hrobjartsson 2001; Hrobjartsson 2010).
We included studies involving people of any age and sex, either vaccinated or unvaccinated (prevention) or who had a diagnosed condition of tetanus (treatment). In this review we include both neonatal tetanus and tetanus cases occurring after the neonatal period.
Studies in which treatment with vitamin C was the only systematic difference between the treatment arms were eligible for inclusion. We included studies comparing outcomes after the administration of vitamin C (ascorbic acid or its salts or other derivatives; orally or intravenously) with the administration of no or a lower dose of vitamin C. We did not apply restrictions on the dosage and frequency of administration of vitamin C, and we considered treatment trials using a single dose and trials in which vitamin C was administered with other treatments, provided co-interventions did not differ between the treatment arms. We regarded 'prevention trials' as those in which regular vitamin C was administered to people who did not have tetanus and 'treatment trials' as those in which vitamin C was administered after the diagnosis of tetanus.
We applied any definition of tetanus applied by the original study authors.
For an outline of the search methods used in first update of this review see Appendix 1.
For this second update the following databases and dates are covered:
The following strategy was used to search The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL):
#1 MeSH descriptor Tetanus explode all trees
#3 (#1 OR #2)
#4 MeSH descriptor Ascorbic Acid explode all trees
#5 ascorb* or "vitamin C"
#6 (#4 OR #5)
#7 (#3 AND #6)
Previously, Briggs 1984 carried out extensive literature searches and published a bibliography containing over 400 references to papers related to vitamin C and infections, which we checked. We also searched the reference lists of all other pertinent reviews and of the potentially eligible studies identified in our search.
The first review author searched the literature and both review authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts to identify potentially relevant articles. We obtained full versions of all potentially eligible articles, which we scrutinised independently.
Both review authors independently extracted pertinent data from the articles selected. We recorded the following quality features of the trials on data extraction forms as 'yes', 'no', 'unclear': randomised allocation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, blinding of investigator, blinding of outcome assessor, blind data analysis and intention-to-treat analysis. We also recorded baseline measurements and percentage dropout during follow up. For a discussion of these quality items, see Higgins 2011 (chapter eight).
We did not calculate any quality scores for selected trials because "quality scores are at best useless and at worst misleading" (Greenland 1994), and "the use of scales for assessing quality or risk of bias is explicitly discouraged in Cochrane reviews. " (Higgins 2011 sect 8.3.3). Furthermore, even though shortcomings in the design and conduct of trials may lead to erroneous conclusions (Higgins 2011 chapter 8), a recent meta-analysis of 276 randomised controlled trials found that double blinding and allocation concealment, two quality measures that are frequently used in meta-analyses, were not associated with treatment effects (Balk 2002). We agree with the Shapiro 1997 comment that "quality is best evaluated qualitatively ... the author should give reasons for judging the quality of any given study as good or bad in transparent and easily comprehensive language. It is then up to the reader to decide whether he agrees or disagrees." Following such reasoning, we decided to describe the weaknesses and strengths of trials explicitly in the 'Risk of bias in included studies' section.
We entered the case fatality rate data of the identified Jahan 1984 study to the RevMan 2009 computer program and calculated the relative risk (RR), presenting the results with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Because a cell of the 2×2 table was empty in one comparison and the RevMan algorithm is inappropriate for analysing such a table, we used the StatXact 2009 software (release 7) to calculate the exact 95% CI for the odds ratio (OR) as an approximation of RR (Rothman 1998). We also calculated the Fisher exact test P-value for the comparisons. We used two-tailed P values in this review.
The patients in the Jahan 1984 trial were divided into two wards by vitamin C administration. Although this may cause bias in treatment, it does not affect the unit of analysis (the individual patient), because tetanus is not a contagious disease.
We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic (Higgins 2003). This examines the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance. A value of I2 greater than about 70% indicates a high level of heterogeneity.
We did not pool the age groups of the Jahan 1984 trial, because there was a high level of heterogeneity.
No new eligible trials were identified in the searches carried out for the first and second updates of this review. From the original search we found one eligible controlled trial that provided data pertinent to vitamin C in the treatment of tetanus patients (Jahan 1984), but we found no trials reporting on the prevention of tetanus with vitamin C. The main features of the Jahan trial are briefly summarised in the table 'Characteristics of included studies', but described in detail in the following section because the weaknesses and strengths are crucial when considering the validity of it's findings. The Jahan 1984 trial was carried out in Bangladesh in the early 1980s. A total of 117 tetanus patients were admitted to the Infectious Disease Hospital in Dhaka and divided into two age groups at recruitment. There were 62 children in the age group 1 to 12 years, and 55 children and adults in the age group 13 to 30 years. The Jahan report is available at www.ltdk.helsinki.fi/users/hemila/CT.
Jahan 1984 did not describe the allocation method, but the vitamin C and control arms were of the same size: 31 compared with 31 in the younger age band; and 27 (vitamin C) compared with 28 (control) in the older participants. Allocation concealment could not be judged from the report. Patients allocated vitamin C received 1 g/day intravenously "in addition to conventional antitetanus therapy which included antitetanus serum, sedatives, antibiotics and muscle relaxant etc." (p 25). Participants allocated to the control arm received conventional antitetanus therapy but the administration of placebo is not mentioned. No baseline data, except for the age ranges, are presented for the two trial arms. There is no description of how tetanus was diagnosed. The authors present results for 117 patients in a table indicating that all recruited patients were included in the analysis. The trialists did not state the duration of intervention or their duration of follow-up, but stated that "patients succumbed to tetanus even three to four weeks after admission" (p 27).
Thus, the Jahan 1984 trial had two age groups with treatment and control arms of similar size and administration of vitamin C was the only systematic difference between them. However, the methodological description in the Jahan report is minimal. The role of the methodological shortcomings in the interpretation of the study results are considered in the 'Discussion' section.
We were able to contact the first author of the Jahan 1984 trial. To our query about the methods of the 1984 trial, we received this reply: "we selected two wards side by side. Patients of one ward were under treatment with vitamin C in addition to conventional treatments. In another ward patients were enrolled as a control group and got only the conventional treatment (without vitamin C). Age groups and the number of patients we tried to match as far as possible. Because we had to take the patients who were inpatients in the hospital we did not use a placebo. We were not able to hide the allocations from the physicians at that stage. Follow up of the patients was until they were discharged as fit persons or died. Diagnosis of the disease was done by a physician specialised in infectious diseases" (Professor Khursheed Jahan, 9 July 2007; personal letter).
We did not identify any trials describing the effects of vitamin C as a prevention for tetanus.
We identified one controlled trial that examined the effects of 1 g/day vitamin C given intravenously for patients with tetanus (Jahan 1984). At recruitment, the participants were stratified into two age groups and the results were reported by the age group.
Ages 1 to 12 years: vitamin C significantly reduced the case fatality rate (0/31; 0% mortality) compared with control (23/31; 74% mortality). According to RevMan, the relative risk (RR) of death (vitamin C relative to control) was 0.02 (95% CI from 0.00 to 0.34). Analysis 1.1; subgroup 1.
Ages 13 to 30 years: vitamin C significantly reduced the case fatality rate (10/27; 37% mortality) compared with control (19/28; 68% mortality). The RR of death was 0.55 (95% CI from 0.31 to 0.95). Analysis 1.1; subgroup 2.
The above RR and CI values were calculated using the RevMan program. However, there were no deaths in the younger tetanus patients administered vitamin C and in such a case RevMan adds 0.5 to each cell of the 2×2 table (Higgins 2011 sect 9.4.4), which leads to an erroneous estimate and P-value. Therefore, we used the StatXact program to calculate the exact CI of the odds ratio (OR) for the young patients: OR of death was 0.00 (95% CI from 0.00 to 0.06). The Fisher's exact test, which is valid for tables with an empty cell, gives P=3×10-10 for the comparison of vitamin C and control arms of the young patients, whereas the RevMan gives P=0.006. For the older tetanus patients, the RevMan algorithm and the Fisher exact test give the same P-value as expected because there were a reasonable number of deaths in both study arms.
We found strong evidence of heterogeneity in the effect of vitamin C between the young and old patients. The RevMan gives the I2 value 90% indicating a high level of heterogeneity. Vitamin C had a greater effect in the younger participants. The authors of the Jahan 1984 trial reported the results of the age groups separately and they did not combine the results. We did not pool the age strata because of the high level of heterogeneity.
Sensitivity analysis based on the rejection of trials with lower methodological quality was not possible because we identified only one trial.
We identified one trial that examined the therapeutic effect of vitamin C on the mortality of people with tetanus(Jahan 1984). In the first update of this review,no new trials were identified. The Jahan 1984 trial reported a highly significant benefit associated with intravenous vitamin C on the case fatality rate of tetanus patients. The methods used in the Jahan trial were, however, unsatisfactory and superficially described. Here we will consider whether potential biases could explain the differences reported in the case fatality rate between the vitamin C and control arms.
Jahan 1984did not state an explicit case definition for tetanus. Although this is a shortcoming in the report, it does not seem reasonable to assume that tetanus was improperly diagnosed in an infectious diseases hospital in a country that had a high incidence of this disease (currently the incidence is lower). Furthermore, the trial author described in a personal letter that the diagnosis was by a "physician specialised in infectious diseases".
Selection bias operates when there are systematic differences between comparison groups at baseline. Adequate randomisation with allocation concealment guards against it. No data were presented by Jahan 1984 to allow us to judge whether the allocation process resulted in balanced allocation between treatment groups for prognostic factors. This trial was not randomised and there is a risk of selection bias (the ward a patient was allocated to determined whether they received vitamin C). However, it is highly unlikely that potential baseline differences could lead to such great difference in mortality between the study arms as reported for the younger patients.
Performance bias operates when there are systematic differences in the care provided apart from the intervention being evaluated. Jahan 1984 stated that both vitamin C and control arms received "conventional antitetanus therapy which included antitetanus serum, sedatives, antibiotics and muscle relaxant etc.", so the administration of vitamin C was the only systematic difference between the trial arms. However, the vitamin C and control patients were treated in different wards, which is unsatisfactory because aspects of treatment could be somewhat different between the two wards. Placebo was not used in Jahan 1984, but a recent meta-analysis found that, in trials examining various topics, placebo arms did not differ from no-treatment arms if the outcome was binary; e.g. mortality (Hrobjartsson 2010). Thus, the care providers may have been aware of which arm the patients had been enrolled into, but it is highly unlikely that such knowledge would have altered treatment to such an extent that it could explain the difference in mortality between the study arms as reported for the younger patients in Jahan 1984.
Attrition bias operates when there are large numbers of people who withdraw from the study or when the rates of withdrawal are different between treatment arms. Attrition bias is unlikely in Jahan 1984, since all patients allocated were followed up and analysed. Furthermore, in a personal letter, the trial author confirmed that all patients were followed up "until they were discharged as fit persons or died".
Detection bias operates when there are systematic differences in the ways outcomes were assessed between treatment groups and is more likely to occur when there is no blinded outcome assessment and when the outcome is subjective. It is unlikely, however, that detection bias is operating in Jahan 1984since the outcome was mortality which is not a subjective outcome. There is minimal possibility of bias in detecting mortality in a hospital.
Consequently, although the methods of the Jahan 1984 trial are poorly described and the trial was poorly conducted, the biases discussed above cannot explain the reported findings. There seems to be no basis to assume attrition bias or detection bias in the trial. Possibly there has been selection bias and performance bias to some degree, but this cannot explain the reported difference in outcomes among the younger participants. Glasziou 2007 argued that rate ratios beyond 10 are highly likely to reflect real treatment effects, even if confounding factors may contribute to the size of the observed effect. In the younger patients of the Jahan trial, the entire confidence interval and not just the point estimate is beyond the ratio of 10. In the older patients of the Jahan trial, the confidence interval of the vitamin C effect is close to the control group level, and therefore the results are not robust to the possibility of selection and performance biases. Nevertheless, the findings in the older patients are consistent with the findings in the younger patients.
Finally, the existence of a single positive study might be explained by publication bias, meaning that researchers tend to report studies with 'positive' results but not those with 'negative' results. With this reasoning, it is possible that Jahan 1984 was published just because vitamin C appeared beneficial (but simply by chance), whereas several trials might remain unpublished because of their negative results. Publication bias may explain findings that are close to statistical significance, but it is an unlikely explanation for highly statistically significant findings such as those of the younger patients in the Jahan 1984 trial. Furthermore, it would seem incomprehensible that publication bias would generate the highly significant difference between the age groups. Therefore we do not consider that publication bias is relevant in this case.
The Jahan 1984 trial is methodologically unsatisfactory and great caution is required in the interpretation of the results; also because there are no other trials giving independent support to the findings. Nevertheless, a few animal studies are consistent with the concept that vitamin C might protect against clostridial toxins (Büller Souto 1939; Dey 1966).
In Jahan 1984, vitamin C was used over and above treatments that are still used for treating tetanus patients. In this respect, the trial is not outdated.
When considering extrapolation of the findings of vitamin C trials, an issue of particular importance is the level of dietary vitamin C intake. A different outcome between the vitamin C and control arms may result from a particularly low dietary intake in the control arm ('marginal vitamin C deficiency') or from the high dose supplementation in the vitamin C arm. In the former case, a small dosage of supplement may produce a similar effect, whereas in the latter case the high dose is necessary. As reference levels: scurvy may be caused by vitamin C intake of less than 10 mg/day, whereas the mean vitamin C intake, for example, in the USA is about 100 mg/day (IOM 2000).
If the biological basis for the results in Jahan 1984 was the treatment of marginal deficiency, this would not provide an explanation for the significant heterogeneity between the age groups, as the dose is so high that it would cure marginal deficiency in both age groups. Thus, it is possible that the high dose, 1 g/day, was essential for the results. Furthermore, the benefit of vitamin C was significantly greater for the younger patients (1 to 12 years), who weigh on average less than the older patients (13 to 30 years). Thus the heterogeneity might have resulted from dose dependency because the dose per weight is higher in the younger patients. However, there are numerous other differences between the younger and older patients, and some of them might explain the heterogeneity as well. Therefore, dose dependency should be considered as only one of the possible reasons for the high level of heterogeneity between the age groups.
In the Jahan 1984 trial, vitamin C was administered intravenously which increases plasma level substantially more than oral administration (Padayatty 2004). Therefore, the same dose of vitamin C as tablets might not have similar effects.
In the Jahan 1984 trial, no adverse effects related to the intravenous 1 g/day vitamin C administration were mentioned.
There is evidence indicating that high dose vitamin C is usually safe when administered intravenously. A matched case control study of cancer patients found that 10 g/day vitamin C by intravenous infusion for 10 days and orally thereafter was associated with a longer survival time which indicates the absence of harmful effects with such a dosage (Cameron 1976). High intravenous vitamin C doses, up to 65 g twice per week for 10 months, have also been reported for cancer patients (Padayatty 2006). A case report described the use of intravenous vitamin C doses at levels up to 28 g/day for a six-year-old boy with tetanus (Klenner 1954). There are few reports of severe harm caused by high-dose vitamin C administration. Furthermore, the death of a 68-year-old African American man was not attributed to the intravenous injection of 80 grams of vitamin C on two consecutive days per se, but to his coincident glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (Campbell 1975). Consequently, there seems to be no concern about the safety of the intravenous dosage level, 1 g/day, used in Jahan 1984.
Cathcart 1981 stated that patients with severe infections can take over 30 g/day of vitamin C orally without suffering from diarrhoea, whereas healthy people can take only 4 to 10 g/day. This difference in tolerable doses may be caused by the changes in vitamin C metabolism because of severe infections (Chakrabarti 1955; Hemilä 2006). Thus, it is possible that the range of safe doses extends to higher levels in people who have severe infections compared with healthy people. Nevertheless, in a pharmacokinetic study, no adverse effects were reported with the administration of up to 100 g of vitamin C intravenously to healthy people (Padayatty 2004).
A single poor quality and poorly reported controlled trial found that 1 g/day intravenous vitamin C significantly reduced death rates in people with tetanus. The poor quality of this trial means that routine vitamin C use cannot be recommended on the basis of this trial alone. There were no evaluations of vitamin C as a prevention for tetanus.
Treatment trials: more research is needed into the effect of vitamin C on mortality of tetanus patients. Vitamin C should be studied as an addition to conventional therapy.
Prevention trials: because of vaccination, tetanus is nearly non-existent in children and middle-aged people in the developed world. Although vaccination should be a priority in developing countries, the prophylactic effects of vitamin C supplementation might be investigated in populations with a high incidence of tetanus.
We are grateful to Sally Bell-Syer, Duncan Chambers, Nicky Cullum, Ruth Foxlee, Andrew Jull, Andrea Nelson, Louise Thwaites, Gill Worthy and Amy Zelmer for their comments on improving the draft review, and for Margaret Carver for copy editing the review. Thanks to Helena Mullineaux who copy edited the updated review.
HH wrote the draft of the protocol and TK commented on the draft. HH carried out the literature searches. Both authors assessed the search results to identify potentially relevant articles and extracted data from the articles selected. HH carried out the statistical analysis and wrote the draft of the review and TK commented on the draft. HH updated the review.
Links to full text papers cited in this review are available at: www.ltdk.helsinki.fi/users/hemila/CT.
Non randomised; allocation method not described.
117 tetanus patients admitted to the Infectious Disease Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Vitamin C intravenously 1 g/day vs. no vitamin C. Both groups received standard treatment.
Case fatality rate.
Poorly described trial (see Risk of bias in included studies).
|Bias||Authors' judgement||Support for judgement|
|Allocation concealment (selection bias)||High risk|
Balk EM, Bonis PAL, Moskowitz H, Schmid CH, Ioannidis JPA, Wang C, et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2002;287(22):2973-82.
Bleck TP. Clostridium tetani (tetanus). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editor(s). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005:2817-22.
Briggs M. Vitamin C and infectious disease: a review of the literature and the results of a randomized, double-blind, prospective study over 8 years. In: Briggs MH, editor(s). Recent Vitamin Research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1984:39-82.
Büller Souto A, Lima C. Action de la vitamine C sur la toxine du Bacillus perfringens. Memorias do Instituto Butantan 1939;12:265-95 [in Portuguese]; 297-311 [in French; same data].
Cameron E, Pauing L. Supplemental ascorbate in the supportive treatment of cancer: Prolongation of survival times in terminal human cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1976;73(10):3685-9.
Campbell GD, Steinberg MH, Bower JD. Ascorbic acid-induced hemolysis in G-6-PD deficiency. Annals of Internal Medicine 1975;82(6):810.
Cathcart RF. Vitamin C, titrating to bowel tolerance, anascorbemia, and acute induced scurvy. Medical Hypotheses 1981;7(11):1359-76.
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Tetanus. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/tetanus.pdf (accessed 23 Oct 2009).
Chakrabarti B, Banerjee S. Dehydroascorbic acid level in blood of patients suffering from various infectious diseases. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 1955;88(4):581-3.
Cook TM, Protheroe RT, Handel JM. Tetanus: a review of the literature. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2001;87(3):477-87.
Daher EF, Abdulkader RC, Motti E, Marcondes M, Sabbaga E, Burdmann EA. Prospective study of tetanus-induced acute renal dysfunction: role of adrenergic overactivity. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1997;57(5):610-4.
Demicheli V, Barale A, Rivetti A. Vaccines for women to prevent neonatal tetanus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD002959. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002959.pub2.
Dey PK. Efficacy of vitamin C in counteracting tetanus toxin toxicity. Naturwissenschaften 1966;53(12):310.
Diliberto EJ Jr, Daniels AJ, Viveros OH. Multicompartmental secretion of ascorbate and its dual role in dopamine beta-hydroxylation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1991;54(Suppl 6):1163S-72S.
Farrar JJ, Yen LM, Cook T, Fairweather N, Binh N, Parry J, et al. Tetanus. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2000;69(3):292-301.
Gergen PJ, McQuillan GM, Kiely M, Ezzati-Rice TM, Sutter RW, Virella G. A population-based serologic survey of immunity to tetanus in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;332(12):761-6.
Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Rawlins M, McCulloch P. When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. BMJ 2007;334(7589):349-51.
Greenland S. Quality scores are useless and potentially misleading. American Journal of Epidemiology 1994;140(3):300-1.
Hathcock JN, Azzi A, Blumberg J, Bray T, Dickinson A, Frei B, et al. Vitamins E and C are safe across a broad range of intakes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;81(4):736-45.
Hemilä H. Do vitamins C and E affect respiratory infections? [Dissertation] http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/laa/kansa/vk/hemila. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, 2006 (accessed 23 Oct 2009).
Hemilä H, Louhiala P. Vitamin C for preventing and treating pneumonia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD005532. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005532.pub2.
Hemilä H, Chalker EB, Douglas RM. Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD000980. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000980.pub3.
Hemilä H, Kaprio J. Modification of the effect of vitamin E supplementation on the mortality of male smokers by age and dietary vitamin C. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009;169(8):946-53.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org..
Hrobjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment [correction in 2001;345(4):304; comments in 2001;344(21):1630-2 and 2001;345(17):1276-9]. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;344(4):1594-602.
Hrobjartsson A, Gotzsche PC. Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003974. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Vitamin C. In: Dietary reference intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium and carotenoids. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000:95-185.
Klenner FR. Recent discoveries in the treatment of lockjaw with vitamin C and tolserol. Tri-State Medical Journal 1954;2(July):7-11.
Levine M, Morita K. Ascorbic acid in endocrine systems. Vitamins and Hormones 1985;42:1-64.
Levine M, Conry-Cantilena C, Wang Y, Welch RW, Washko PW, Dhariwal KR, et al. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: evidence for a recommended dietary allowance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1996;93(8):3704-9.
Padayatty SJ, Sun H, Wang Y, Riordan HD, Hewitt SM, Katz A, et al. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics: implications for oral and intravenous use. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004;140(7):533-7.
Padayatty SJ, Riordan HD, Hewitt SM, Katz A, Hoffer LJ, Levine M. Intravenously administered vitamin C as cancer therapy: three cases. CMAJ 2006;174(7):937-42.
Patak P, Willenberg HS, Bornstein SR. Vitamin C is an important cofactor for both adrenal cortex and adrenal medulla. Endocrine Research 2004;30(4):871-5.
Review Manager [Computer program]. Version 5.0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. www.cc-ims.net/revman (accessed 27 Oct 2009).
Rhee P, Nunley MK, Demetriades D, Velmahos G, Doucet JJ. Tetanus and trauma: a review and recommendations. Journal of Trauma 2005;58(5):1082-8.
Rice ME. Ascorbate regulation and its neuroprotective role in the brain. Trends in Neurological Sciences 2000;23(5):209-16.
Rivers JM. Safety of high-level vitamin C ingestion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1987;498:445-54.
Roper MH, Vandelaer JH, Gasse FL. Maternal and neonatal tetanus. Lancet 2007;370(9603):1947-59.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Small sample statistics for pure count data. In: Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edition. London: Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins, 1998:250-2.
Shapiro S. Is meta-analysis a valid approach to the evaluation of small effects in observational studies? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997;50(3):223-9.
StatXact [Computer program]. Version 7. Cambridge, MA: Cytel Inc, 2009. www.cytel.com/products/statxact (accessed 24 Oct 2009).
Stone I. The Healing Factor. Vitamin C Against Disease. New York, NY: Grosset & Dunlap, 1972.
Thwaites CL, Farrar JJ. Preventing and treating tetanus: the challenge continues in the face of neglect and lack of research. BMJ 2003;326(7381):117-8.
Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Glover C, Tuan PQ, Nga NT, Parry J, et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of tetanus: the tetanus severity score. Tropical Medicine and International Health 2006;11(3):279-87.
Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Cordon SM, Binh NT, Nga N, White NJ, et al. Urinary catecholamine excretion in tetanus. Anaesthesia 2006;61(4):355-9.
Wasay M, Khealani BA, Talati N, Shamsi R, Syed NA, Salahuddin N. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction predicts poor prognosis in patients with mild to moderate tetanus. BMC Neurology 2005;5(1):2.
WHO (World Health Organization). Recent outbreaks of scurvy. In: Scurvy and its prevention and control in major emergencies [WHO/NHD/99.11]. WHO, 1999:2-4; Table 2. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_NHD_99.11.pdf (accessed 24 Oct 2009).
WHO (World Health Organization). Maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination by 2005. Annex C: p. 27. www.who.int/vaccines-documents/DocsPDF02/www692.pdf (accessed 24 Oct 2009) 2000.
|Outcome or Subgroup||Studies||Participants||Statistical Method||Effect Estimate|
|1.1 Case fatality rate||1||Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)||Subtotals only|
|1.1.1 aged 1 to 12 years||1||62||Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)||0.02 [0.00, 0.34]|
|1.1.2 aged 13 to 30 years||1||55||Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)||0.55 [0.31, 0.95]|
For this first update we searched the following electronic databases:
Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (Searched 11/11/09);
Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register (Searched 23/11/09);
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) - The Cochrane Library 2008 Issue 4;
Ovid MEDLINE - 1950 to 2009 Nov Week 1;
Ovid EMBASE - 2005 to 2009 Week 45.
The following strategy was used to search The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL):
#1 MeSH descriptor Tetanus explode all trees
#3 (#1 OR #2)
#4 MeSH descriptor Ascorbic Acid explode all trees
#5 ascorb* or "vitamin C"
#6 (#4 OR #5)
#7 (#3 AND #6)
Searching other resources
We searched the review by Briggs 1984 and the books by Levy 2002 and Stone 1972, which list extensively the older literature related to vitamin C and infections. We also searched the reference lists of all other pertinent reviews and of the potentially eligible studies identified in our search.
1 exp Tetanus/
2 exp Tetanus Toxin/
3 exp Tetanus Toxoid/
6 exp Ascorbic Acid/
8 (vitamin$ adj5 C).mp.
10 5 and 9